Constitutional Litigation

Within this category, we offer sponsorship to our clients in proceedings under direct and indirect constitutional controversies and unconstitutional actions, including all resources and events that occur in processing.

The amparo is a legal institution that seeks to protect the governed against any act of government (Executive, Legislative and Judicial) to the detriment of their rights violates the Constitution of the United Mexican States, particularly individual rights enshrined it.

Individual rights are the rights of the governed against the public authority (authorities).

Essential under the notes, can be combined in the following description: The basis is a trial that is initiated by any action that exercises ruled in the courts (judges) federal authority against any act that causes an injury in his field Legal and consider contrary to the Constitution, with the aim to invalidate the act by its unconstitutionality or illegality in the specific case originated.

The constitutional controversies and actions of unconstitutionality, as the amparo, are a means of defending the Constitution General. Constitutional disputes are disputes as a result of the federal structure and division of powers in the Mexican State may arise between different normative orders, between organs that belong to different orders, as well as between organs that are part of the same order, which may be raised directly with the Supreme Court of the Nation (SCJN).

For its part, the actions of unconstitutionality are the challenge to raise itself SCJN the possible contradiction between a general rule, whether federal or local, or international treaties and the Constitution itself, are entitled to promote i) a qualified minority of legislative bodies have adopted the standard; ii) the Attorney General, iii) political parties and iv) The National Human Rights Commission.